Struttura `node_modules` con collegamenti simbolici
This article only describes how pnpm's node_modules
are structured when
there are no packages with peer dependencies. For the more complex scenario of
dependencies with peers, see how peers are resolved.
pnpm's node_modules
layout uses symbolic links to create a nested structure of
dependencies.
Every file of every package inside node_modules
is a hard link to the
content-addressable store. Let's say you install foo@1.0.0
that depends on
bar@1.0.0
. pnpm will hard link both packages to node_modules
like this:
node_modules
└── .pnpm
├── bar@1.0.0
│ └── node_modules
│ └── bar
│ ├── index.js -> <store>/001
│ └── package.json -> <store>/002
└── foo@1.0.0
└── node_modules
└── foo
├── index.js -> <store>/003
└── package.json -> <store>/004
These are the only "real" files in node_modules
. Once all the packages are
hard linked to node_modules
, symbolic links are created to build the nested
dependency graph structure.
As you might have noticed, both packages are hard linked into a subfolder inside
a node_modules
folder (foo@1.0.0/node_modules/foo
). Ciò è necessario per:
- allow packages to import themselves.
foo
should be able torequire('foo/package.json')
orimport * as package from "foo/package.json"
. - avoid circular symlinks. Dependencies of packages are placed in the same
folder in which the dependent packages are. For Node.js it doesn't make a
difference whether dependencies are inside the package's
node_modules
or in any othernode_modules
in the parent directories.
La fase successiva dell'installazione è il collegamento simbolico delle dipendenze. bar
is going to be
symlinked to the foo@1.0.0/node_modules
folder:
node_modules
└── .pnpm
├── bar@1.0.0
│ └── node_modules
│ └── bar -> <store>
└── foo@1.0.0
└── node_modules
├── foo -> <store>
└── bar -> ../../bar@1.0.0/node_modules/bar
Successivamente, vengono gestite le dipendenze dirette. foo
is going to be symlinked into the
root node_modules
folder because foo
is a dependency of the project:
node_modules
├── foo -> ./.pnpm/foo@1.0.0/node_modules/foo
└── .pnpm
├── bar@1.0.0
│ └── node_modules
│ └── bar -> <store>
└── foo@1.0.0
└── node_modules
├── foo -> <store>
└── bar -> ../../bar@1.0.0/node_modules/bar
Questo è un esempio molto semplice. Tuttavia, il layout manterrà questa struttura indipendentemente dal numero di dipendenze e dalla profondità del grafico delle dipendenze.
Let's add qar@2.0.0
as a dependency of bar
and foo
. Ecco come apparirà la nuova struttura:
node_modules
├── foo -> ./.pnpm/foo@1.0.0/node_modules/foo
└── .pnpm
├── bar@1.0.0
│ └── node_modules
│ ├── bar -> <store>
│ └── qar -> ../../qar@2.0.0/node_modules/qar
├── foo@1.0.0
│ └── node_modules
│ ├── foo -> <store>
│ ├── bar -> ../../bar@1.0.0/node_modules/bar
│ └── qar -> ../../qar@2.0.0/node_modules/qar
└── qar@2.0.0
└── node_modules
└── qar -> <store>
As you may see, even though the graph is deeper now (foo > bar > qar
), the
directory depth in the file system is still the same.
Questo layout potrebbe sembrare strano a prima vista, ma è completamente compatibile
con l'algoritmo di risoluzione del modulo di Node! When resolving modules, Node ignores
symlinks, so when bar
is required from foo@1.0.0/node_modules/foo/index.js
,
Node does not use bar
at foo@1.0.0/node_modules/bar
, but instead, bar
is
resolved to its real location (bar@1.0.0/node_modules/bar
). As a consequence,
bar
can also resolve its dependencies which are in bar@1.0.0/node_modules
.
Un grande bonus di questo layout è che solo i pacchetti che sono davvero nelle dipendenze
sono accessibili. With a flattened node_modules
structure, all
hoisted packages are accessible. To read more about why this is an advantage,
see "pnpm's strictness helps to avoid silly bugs"
Unfortunately, many packages in the ecosystem are broken — they use dependencies that are not listed in their package.json
. To minimize the number of issues new users encounter, pnpm hoists all dependencies by default into node_modules/.pnpm/node_modules
. To disable this hoisting, set hoist to false
.